This set of review criteria will be applied for all full papers and for non-paper-based contributions such as workshops and round table discussions.
1. Review criteria for concept full papers
2. Review criteria for research full papers
3. Review criteria for workshops and round table discussion
1. Review criteria for concept full papers
This set of review criteria will be applied for all full papers, which state to be concept papers:
existing scholarship in the field
theories and/or conceptual framework used
appropriate context
rationale for the work
scope of the work
methodological approach
description of findings with qualitative / quantitative results, insights, lessons learnt
appropriate conclusions based on the findings
findings are put into perspectives
information or ideas that are of interest to the SEFI community
Back to top
2. Review criteria for research full papers
This set of review criteria will be applied for all full papers, which state to be research papers:
rationale of the study (background / introduction)
methods & research design (Are methods chosen appropriate (data assessment and analysis)?)
data analysis and results
interpretation and discussion of results
conclusions
impact on Engineering Education (EE)
recommended interventions to develop EE
significance for EE
is the study an original study and reflects good practice in Engineering Education Research (EER)?
Back to top
3. Review criteria for workshops and round table discussions
This set of review criteria will be applied for workshops and other proposals, which do not require submission of a full paper:
motivation for attending and learning outcomes for the sessions
background and rationale of the session
engaging session design, aligned with the learning outcomes
rationale for the work
significance for Engineering Education
Back to top